DECISION ' This is an appeal against the order of learned Presiding Officer, Sindh Labour Court No, VI at Hyderabad, dated 9-5-1990; whereby the grievance petition of the appellant was dismissed on the ground that it was time-barred.
2. I have heard Mr. S. Fasahat Hussain Rizvi, the learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Rafiq Ahmad, A.-G.P. For the respondents and have also gone through the record and proceedings of the case.
3. The appellant was removed from service on 11-1-1989, vide order, dated 124-1989. Whereas, he served grievance notiee upon the respondents on 17-5-1989. The case of the appellant is that his services were terminated on 20-2-1989, therefore, the notice was within time. Annexure `A/1' which was filed by the appellant alongwith his grievance petition shows that he was removed from service on 10-1-1989. This is the document produced by the appellant himself and it has come from the possession of the appellant. As such, it would be correct. Grievance notice, dated 17-5-1989 is obviously time-barred as it is beyond the period of 3 months as prescribed under section 25-A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. The learned Labour Court has, therefore, rightly held that the grievance petition is time-barred. I see no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.