Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1992 SCMR 698

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE vs THE STATE

Citation1992 SCMR 698
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Petition No,77 of 1990 and Jail Petition No, .P 54-R of 1989
Date1991-05-16
Judge(s)Nasim Hasan Shah, Abdul Shakurul Salam
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

1. ' NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.---This order will dispose of the above-noted two petitions for leave to appeal.

2. ' The petitioner Muhammad Rafique was convicted under section 302, P.P.C. And sentenced to death. The death sentence has been confirmed by the High Court vide judgment dated 6-3-1989.

3. ' Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner first filed a petition against it from Jail (J.P.No, 54-R of 1989). He has, thereafter, moved a Criminal Petition for leave (Cr.P.S.LA.No,77 of 1990) through counsel. Both these petitions have been heard together today.

4. ' According to the averments made by the petitioner in his petition from jail, he is now serving sentence of life imprisonment in view of the orders of commutation passed by the President of Pakistan.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Qazi Muhammad Saleem, has stated that he is content if the petitioner is awarded the lesser sentence of life imprisonment and would be satisfied with the reduction of his sentence. Accordingly.

6. ' On our pointing out that the petitioner has himself stated that he is now undergoing the sentence of life imprisonment, under orders of the President, he submits that the validity of such orders is being challenged in the High Court through several Constitutional petitions and in case these petitions succeed the sentence of death may be executed against the petitioner.

7. ' We, accordingly, order that these petitions shall stand dismissed but subject to the condition that if at any stage the orders of commutation passed by the President are varied and the sentence of death is sought to be executed against the petitioner, he can revive the present petitions for leave for disposal on merits.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch