Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1992 SCMR 2325

JAVED MASIH and 3 others vs THE STATE

Citation1992 SCMR 2325
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Petition No,26(S)-of 1992
Date1992-08-23
Judge(s)Saleem Akhter, Maulana Muhammad Taqi Usmani
ResultLeave granted

ORDER

1. ' SALEEM AKHTAR, J.---The petitioners have been convicted by the Federal Shariat Court under section 302/34, P.P.C. And under section 17(4) of the Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979. The incident occurred in the night of 12 and 13-8-1988, when Turab Gul, Zahid Noor and Haji Muhammad Ayub, Chowkidars of the building were murdered by the petitioner by electrocuting them. Report was also lodged and on investigation it was found that `Khan Deposit Certificates' valuing Rs30 lacs and another lot of Ithas Deposit Certificates' of Rs,20 lacs were robbed besides other articles comprising of watches, ball pen points and lighters. The particular of such items was furnished by P.W. Rajab Ali and P.W. Shamim Ahmed Siddiqui. According to the petitioner No,1, he was arrested on 15-8-1988 while the other were arrested on 21-8-1988. `Khas Deposit Certificates' of Rs,50 lacs and cash amount of R4.17,000 were recovered from petitioner No,2. Similarly, cash and watches were also recovered from petitioners Nos.3 and 4. Besides this, from petitioner No,1, Seiko watches, blood-stained `Shalwar Qamiz', a cassette entitled `Bekhr-e- Moti' were recovered. Petitioner No,4 made confession and inculpated the other petitioners.

2. ' The learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the confession made by petitioner No,4 was exculpatory in nature and could not be relied upon for convicting petitioners Nos.1, 2 and 3. He has also challenged the recovery and arrest of the petitioners. The significant aspect of the case is that there is no eye-witness of the incident. The entire prosecution is based on the confession, recovery and circumstantial evidence. In these circumstances for proper administration of criminal justice, it would be necessary to re-appraise the evidence. We, therefore, grant leave.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch