1. ' I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at some length. Leraned counsel have brought to my notice that Mr. S.M. Nasim, learned Additional Chief Land Commissioner was not appointed as a full-fledged Member, Board of Revenue when he heard and decided the revision petition of the petitioner on 22-6-1974. It is thus argued by both the learned counsel that Mr. S.M. Nasim was not competent to decide the controversy and as such the lis between the parties was still pending adjudication. In this behalf learned counsel have relied upon the judgment reported as Barkat Ali v.
2. Bashir Ahmad 1980 SCM R 731. Admittedly, Mr. S.M. Nasim, learned Additional Chief Land Commissioner was not at all competent to hear and decide the revision of the petitioner on the short ground that he was not appointed as a Member (Colonies), Board of Revenue. respectfully following the above said judgment, the impugned order dated 22-6-1974 is declared to be quoram non judice, and as such, it is set aside. The petition succeeds and is allowed leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Revision of the petitioner shall be deemed to be pending before the learned Member (Colonies), Board of Revenue. It is desired that the learned Member shall decide the revision on its merits after hearing the parties as early as possible. This petition succeeds and is allowed leaving the parties to bear their own costs. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.