Facts leading to the filing of this revision are that respondent was tried by Magistrate Section 30, Kasur for an offence under section 307, P.P.C. The trial Court vide his judgment dated 27-10-1983 gave the benefit of doubt and acquitted him, on the ground that the recovery of revolver at the instance of the respondent could not be proved because no independent witness from public was associated to witness the recovery proceedings. The trial Court further held that witnesses were inter se related, therefore, were interested. As far as Ghulam Qadir P.W.4 was concerned it was held that his statement did not inspire confidence. The trial Court also noticed discrepancy appearing in the statement of Ghulam Qadir P.W.4.
2. After going through the file as well as judgment impugned and evidence produced in support of its case I find that cogent reasons were given by the Court for extending benefit of doubt to the respondent to which no I exception can be taken at this stage. I have further noticed that the occurrence had taken place in the year 1980 and at this stage no useful purpose would be served if the case is sent back to the trial Court for fresh trial.
3. For what has been discussed above I find no merits in this revision which is accordingly dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.