1. SYED ALLY MADAD SHAH (CHAIRMAN).---The learned counsel for the appellant does not press the appeal on merits but he submits that the appellant was subjected to the punishment of removal from service whereas one Feroz Alam, Inspector, who also was involved alongwith the appellant was deak with leniently and he was imposed the punishment of stoppage of only four increments as admitted in the written objections/parawise comments filed by the respondents. The learned counsel for the respondents states that the appellant also could be dealt with like Feroz Alam, Inspector, as the allegations were of similar nature. We allow the appeal to the extent that the punishment of removal from service awarded on the appellants under order dated 14-5-1985 shall stand modified to that of stoppage of his four increments. We would further order that the appellant shall be entitled to reinstatement in service with consequential benefits as admissible.