1. NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.---The writ petition filed by the petitioner-Mills was dismissed, inter alia, on the ground that the Labour Courts had found against the petitioner because neither the record of the office nor the audit reports were produced to enable it to examine the propriety or otherwise of the ground that the Mills were closed on account of the financial losses suffered by it.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that before the High Court it was pointed out that the balance-sheets had been placed on the record (Exs.P.1 and P.4) which reflected the audited accounts of the petitioner Mills.
3. It is, accordingly, contended that the judgment of the High Court is based on non-reading and overlooking of material pieces of evidence. It is also submitted that the judgment of this Court entitled South British Insurance Employees' Union v. The Sindh Labour Court No.4 and others (1975 SCMR 49) has not been properly construed by the High Court.
4. Security in the sum of Rs.5,000.
5. The appeal shall be made ready on the present record with liberty to the parties to add further documents and put up for hearing at a very early date.