1. ' SALAHUDDIN ARMED, J.-This petition is from the order of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court refusing to review his previous order allowing a writ petition.
2. It has been contended before us that the learned Single Judge has not considered certain documents favouring the petitioner's case. This point does not appear to have been raised before the learned Single Judge. It has not been stated in this petition that although this point wad raised, it was not considered by the learned Judge. We cannot, therefore, permit the petitioner to raise the point before us for the first time.
3. ' The next contention is that the learned Judge has misread certain documents. Only two cases of such misreading were placed before the learned Judge and they were rejected. The learned Judge quoted facts in support of the rejection.
4. ' This is not a fit case for interference. The petition is dismissed.