ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY, J: --Leave to appeal has been sought against the judgment of the High Court dated 16-8-1990.
2. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of the land in dispute against the respondents on the ground that the disputed property is ancestral property of the petitioner and the respondents were inducted as tenant-at-will but without any knowledge of the petitioner. The entries in the Revenue Record in favour of the respondents have been made as Lath Buad Bazgars (occupancy tenants). The respondents contested the suit. The trial Court decreed the suit in favour of the petitioner on 18-12-1989. The respondent No.1's appeal was accepted by Majlis-i-Shoora on 10-4-1990. The petitioner's revision petition was dismissed by the High Court. The High Court after the assessment of the evidence has observed that the respondents are in cultivatory occupation of the suit land for the last several years. The evidence also suggests that certain Laths have also been made by them. Therefore, on merits, the petitioner was not able to prove his case.
3. The entries are in favour of the respondents. There is no entry that the respondents are tenants- at-will. There is also no evidence that they were inducted as tenants by the petitioner. The petitioner has led sketchy evidence which has been disbelieved by the two Courts. There are concurrent findings of fact against the petitioner. No ground exists for interference by this Court.
This petition has no force. The same is dismissed and leave to appeal is refused.