1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.---Leave to appeal has been sought by the defendant in a money suit; against the dismissal by the High Court of his Civil Revision on the finding that there being no misreading or non-reading of evidence no justification was made out for exercise of revisional jurisdiction.
2. The petitioner has lost throughout and now the decree for recovery of Rs.7,262.79 stands affirmed also by the High Court. The only argument after the rejection of the petitioner's pleas on merits pressed by his learned counsel before us relates to the plea of limitation.
3. The liability to pay the amount has been established against the petitioner. After hearing the learned counsel on the point of limitation we do not consider it a fit case for exercise of the discretionary jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in granting leave to appeal in his favour. The same, accordingly, is refused.