DECISION The learned Presiding Officer of Sind Labour Court No. V, Karachi, dismissed the application of the appellant-Union, filed under section 32 (1-A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1959 (hereinafter called the Ordinance), on the ground that under the settlement between the parties, dated 30th October 1972, it was agreed that no fresh demand involving financial implications, direct or indirect, shall be raised during the operative period of the said settlement. The Union had pressed only two demands, namely: (1)Washermen should be provided all facilities and benefits in time with other workers. (2)Illegal deduction of Rs. 75 p.m. for 13 months from the salary of Mrs. Mybil Vaz be returned to her immediately.
2. I have heard the learned Representatives for the parties and I havej come to the conclusion that the learned Labour Court has rightly dismissed/* the application filed by the Union. The appeal is dismissed. The award' of the learned Labour Court is maintained.