1. SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.---Leave to appeal is granted under Article 212(3) of the Constitution to examine the following questions of law of public importance:--
(1) Could the Service Tribunal completely ignore the factual finding of departmental authority to the following effect:-- "A departmental examination envisages a number of candidates as well as the holding of an actual examination. It does not appear to have been held. In the present case it was an excuse used for shifting the seniority.
2. Under the circumstances I Find that the appeal of Rahim Ahmad holds merit and his seniority should count from the order of 27-2-1980, which places him senior to Abdur Rashid. The appeal is thus, accepted." and sanctify the selection of the respondent No.5 suffering from such a taint?
(2) Whether the finding of Service Tribunal to the effect that "it is established beyond reasonable doubt that the promotion order of respondent No.4 was temporarily made in his own pay and scale. So in no way it conferred upon respondent No.4 the seniority over appellant", is manifestly incorrect. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.