The facts leading to the riling of this appeal are that appellants Muhammad Zaman, Falak Sher, Yasin, Allah Ditta and Muhammad Ashiq were tried by Mr. Gulzar Muhammad Bhatti, Magistrate Section 30, Okara for offences under section 307/325/148/149, P.P.C. The learned trial Court vide its judgment, dated 23-1-1990 convicted and sentenced each of them under section 307/149, P.P.C. To live years' R.I. With a fine of Rs.5,000 or in default of payment of fine, one year's S.I. Each of the appellants was also convicted and sentenced under section 325/149, P.P.C. To two years' R.I. With a fine of Rs.2,000 or in default of payment of fine, S.I. For six months. They were also convicted and sentenced under section 148, P.P.C. To one year's R.I. Each with a fine of Rs.1,000 each and in default of payment of fine further S.I. For three months each. Each of them was further directed to pay compensation under section 544-A, Cr.P.C. Of Rs.5,000 and Rs.1,pW to Liaqat Ali, injured P.W., or in default of payment of compensation S.I. For three months. This judgment shall dispose of the appeal filed by the appellants.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants, at the very outset, submitted that the parties have compromised and the injured complainant Liaqat Ali has sworn an affidavit to the effect that he has entered into a compromise with the appellants and has pardoned them. He further has sworn that he did not wish to receive any compensation. Said Liaqat Ali also appeared in person: He was duly identified by the learned counsel for the appellants. He once again stated before the Court that all the appellants belong to the same village and in view of the compromise, he did not wish to pursue the matter any further. He also stated that he has forgiven the appellants.