' SYED ALLY MADAD SHAH (CHAIRMAN).--Appellant Muhammad Safdar, who was a Laboratory Assistant in the Directorate of Films and Publications, Government of Pakistan, has preferred this appeal for getting pensionary benefits. His services were terminated earlier. He had preferred Appeal No, 73 (K)/83 before this Tribunal. The appeal was dismissed vide judgment dated 27-11- 1984, on the grounds that the appeal was time-barred and the appellant was not a civil servant within the definition of the term in the Civil Servants Act, 1973. However, he made an application to the Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Islamabad on 5-1-1985 for pensionary benefits. Failing to get any orders, he filed this appeal on 4-5-1985.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. He states that no appeal was preferred against the judgment of this Tribunal in Appeal No, 73 (K)/83, which was dismissed on the ground that the appellant was not a civil servant. That being the position the appellant cannot maintain this appeal before us. Even otherwise, there is no order which could be appealed against in this appeal and, therefore, the appeal cannot be maintained.
3. For the reasons recorded above, we dismiss the appeal as not maintainable. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.