1. SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J: --Mian Abdur Rashid Advocate Supreme Court has already been permitted in this review petition to substitute the learned counsel and also the Advocate-on-Record, who originally were engaged for presenting the case of the petitioner before this Court when the impugned judgment was passed.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner wants to take up a ground which was never earlier raised nor has been dealt with by any of the courts, namely, that the identity of the property as was purchased by the respondent and the one which the petitioner had agreed to purchase was not established because the Khasra Numbers of the two properties were different. This ground would not be available to the petitioner on account of the fact that it was not taken up at any earlier stage, and also for the reason that the particulars and description of the property is not confined to its Khasra numbers but is provided in sufficient detail otherwise to identify the property. This petition has no merit and is, therefore, dismissed.