Pakistan Case Law← Search
1991 SCMR 1564

MUHAMMAD HASHIM And 3 Others vs SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS)

Citation1991 SCMR 1564
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.338 of 1986 W.P. No.1593-R of
Date1990-01-22
Judge(s)Nasim Hasan Shah, Syed Usman Ali Shah
ResultLeave granted

ORDER

1. S. USMAN ALI SHAH, J.---Leave to appeal has been sought by the petitioners against the order of the Lahore High Court dated 19-1-1986, whereby their Constitutional petition against the order dated 27-12-1976 passed by the Settlement Commissioner (Lands) Lahore was dismissed.

2. The land in dispute was reserved by the Deputy Settlement Commissioner (Lands) on 2-12-1967, for allotment to the petitioners being displaced persons, but it was confirmed in the names of respondents Nos.3-6 on 13-4-1968, without cancellation of reservation made for the petitioners.

3. Appeal of the petitioners before the Addl. Settlement Commissioner, Gujranwala was accepted, who vide his order dated 18-8-1969 cancelled the allotment made to the respondents and directed confirmation of the disputed land in the names of the petitioners to be made strictly in accordance with the rules and instructions. Consequently, the disputed land was confirmed in the names of the petitioners on Khata R.L.II No.29 by the D.S.C.(L) Gujranawala on 6-12-1972. Appeal of the respondents against this order which was treated as revision and entrusted to the Settlement Commissioner (Lands), Lahore was accepted vide his order dated 27-12-1976 and allotment already made in the names of the petitioners was cancelled. Constitutional petition against this order by the petitioners before the High Court was also dismissed vide impugned judgment.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners before us contended that the learned Single Judge of the High Court has ignored to consider that the allotment obtained on a bogus claim form No.1401 in village Vachhoki, Tehsil Hafizabad was cancelled by the Add]. Settlement Commissioner/C.S.C. On 22-9-1977 being void ab initio and the respondents who stepped into the shoes of the vendor claimant have no right in the claim of the disputed land.

5. After hearing the learned counsel, we are of the opinion that the contention raised by him deserves consideration. We, therefore, grant leave to appeal and allow the petition. Status quo in meanwhile, Security Rs.5,000.

6. The appeal will be heard on the present record, but it is open to the parties to file additional documents.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search