This is an application for the cancellation of bail granted to Allah Bakhsh respondent in case under section 307/34, P.P.C. Registered at P.S. Muzaffarabad, vide F.I.R. No.15 of 1990, dated 25-1-1990.
2. The prosecution, case is that the respondent and his co-accused launched murderous assault on Rahim Bakhsh and caused him injuries on 25-1-1990 in Ferozepur of Police Station Muzaffarabad. As for the respondent, it has been alleged that he had caused of knife blows on the person of Rahim Bakhsh P.W.
3. Learned counsel or the petitioner submits that the injury allegedly caused by the respondent was grievous; that his earlier applications for bail were rejected twice and that he was allowed bail on 8-9-1989, although no fresh ground has arisen in due curse events.
4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel with care. I do not agree with him. I find that after the rejection of his earlier applications for ail, that case was fixed for hearing but the prosecution did not produce witness, and as such, it cannot be said that no fresh ground had arisen in due course A events. It seems to me that since the trial Court and the learned Additional Sessions Judge had refused to release the accused on bail, therefore, the prosecution deliberately withheld the evidence to prolong the detention of the respondent jail. It is, well settled that once bail is granted by a Court of competent jurisdiction, then strong and exceptional grounds would be required for interference with the same, which 1 do not see in the case in hand. So, the application is dismissed in limine.