1. The facts leading to the filing of this appeal are that Muhammad Ashraf appellant alongwith others, was tried by Additional Sessions Judge, Sheikhupura, for offences under section 302/307/452/148/149, P.P.C. The trial Court vide its judgment dated 28-11-1987, acquitted the appellant for the charge under section 302/307, P.P.C. But convicted him under section 304, Part 1, P.P.C. To 10 years' R.I. With a fine of Rs.1.0,000 or in default one year's R.J. Another co-accused of the appellant was convicted under section 323, P.P.C. To one year's R.I. And fine of Rs.500 or in default, two months' R.I. Rest of the accused were, however, acquitted.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant at the very outset submits that ever since the registration of case the appellant was in jail. As he was given the benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C., he had already served the entire period of his sentence and has been released from jail. In these circumstances he does not challenge the judgment impugned. Submits that the appeal has already become infructuous. Learned counsel for the appellant also produced the appellant in Court. According to him he has been released from jail recently. Since the appellant has already undergone the entire period of his sentence and he does not challenge his conviction and sentence, therefore, the appeal is accordingly disposed of. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.