1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, CJ.---Leave to appeal has been sought by the plaintiffs side against the dismissal by the High Court of their civil revision which had arisen out of suit relating to inheritance.
2. The petitioners' suit was decreed; but the respondents' appeal having been allowed on a finding of fact that Nazar Hussain deceased last owner was a Sunni, the petitioners' civil revision was also dismissed by the High Court on affirmation of the said finding of fact.
3. Learned counsel has contended that the impugned judgment and the findings of fact affirmed therein are based on misreading of evidence. When questioned as to what are those items of evidence which have been misread, learned counsel could not point out any specific parts of the evidence. He, however, contended that the deceased used to give donation for Shia causes and also used to attend their Majalis. He also stated that the controversy relating to the performance of funeral ceremony whether in accordance with the Shia rites or the Sunni rites has also not been properly resolved.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners in support of this petition and the point raised by him we are of the view that the findings of fact rendered all against the petitioners by the two higher Courts, notwithstanding the acceptance of their plea by the lower Court, are unexceptionable. No infirmity legal or of principle having been discovered nor there being any misreading or non-reading, we do not find any justification for interference. Leave to appeal is, therefore, refused.