ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN. J.----The learned counsel for the appellant in the outset has pointed out that the learned Sessions Judge disallowed the examina--petition of Abdul Qadeer D. W. 1 which the appellant wanted to examine in defence to show that Muhammad Ramzan P. W. Was not present at the place of occurrence and was on duty in Koh-i-Noor Textile Mills. He has said that can account of this defect the case may be remanded. The State Counsel has conceded that the case be remanded.
2. The question put to Mr. Abdul Qadeer D. W, 1 by the learned defence counsel reads as under: - ---Q. Where Vas the said Muhammad Ramzan on 21st November 1969? Was he not on duty in your Mils from 6 a.m. To 2 p.m,?--- Flt, it is clear from the above-quoted question that the appellant wanted to show that Muhammad Ramzan P. W. Was not present at the time of occurrence and was on duty in Koh-i-Noor Textile Mills from 6 am to 2 p.m. The appellant was entitled to prove that the eye-witnesses did not see the occurrence. The learned Sessions Judge erred in disallowing the question by which great miscarriage of justice alas taken place.
3. For the reasons given above the conviction and the sentence patter by the learned Sessions Judge are set aide and the case is remanded with the direction that Abdul Qadeer (D. W. I) Labour and Personnel Officer Koh-i-Noor Textile Mills or any other witness knowing the facts if D.W.1 is not available now be examined on the point if Muhammad Ramzan P. W. Was or was not on duty on 21st November 1969 from 6 a.m. To 2 p.m. If the learned Sessions Judge who tried the case has been transferred away his successor will make trial de novo.