SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.---The petitioner seeks review of our judgment dated 27-3-1989 on the ground that he was entitled to the entire plot as against the respondents who had at one stage or the other abandoned their claim to it.
2. Sh. Abdul Manan, Advocate has been permitted to argue this review petition as the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S.A. Saeed has expired a few days ago and substitution has become necessary.
3. The Settlement Commissioner held it as a fact that the property in dispute was a plot and not a built up area, that only seven marlas of it was in possession of the petitioner and that he had in Form `A' applied only for seven marlas. In view of these admitted facts, if the petitioner has been confined to his original claim, he cannot make the technical grounds the basis for obtaining more.
4. No case is made out and the petition is dismissed.