1. S. USMAN ALI SHAH, J.---This petition for special leave to appeal is directed against the order of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan dated 24-8-1986, whereby the petitioners' writ petition against the orders passed by the respondents Nos.1 to 3 respectively, was dismissed.
2. The respondents Nos.4 and 5 who were the tenants in possession of the land in dispute, filed an application before the Collector Multan against their forcible ejectment by the petitioners. The learned Collector vide his order dated 21-9-1980 accepted the said application and directed the restoration of their tenancy. On the basis of this order the said respondents applied to the Tehsildar for correction in the Khasra Girdawari for the Rabi 1981 which was rejected by his order dated 13-6- 1981. The respondents against the order of the Tehsildar again went in appeal before the Collector who vide his order dated 29-10-1984 not only allowed the appeal of the respondents but also directed that the order dated 21-9-1980 directing restoration of tenancy of the respondents be implemented. Appeal of the petitioners before the Addl. Commissioner and their subsequent revision before the Member, Board of Revenue were dismissed vide orders dated 12-6-1986 and 13- 7-1986 respectively. The petitioners then went in writ petition before the High Court. The same was also dismissed in limine. Hence this petition for leave.
3. We have heard the learned counsel of the parties and have gone through the findings of the Courts below. The learned counsel for petitioners when questioned to state the position of the petitioners that how they claim and show interest in the property in dispute as apparently they are trespassers. He failed to give us a satisfactory reply. We find that the order of restoration dated 10- 11-1980 I has not been implemented and the petitioners after the rejection of their appeal also failed in writ petition before the High Court. All the Courts below have consistently held that the order of restoration has not been implemented. That being so, no justification has been made out for the grant of leave to appeal. This petition, therefore, is dismissed.