' Khadim Hussain, respondent No,3 filed an application against the petitioners and respondents Nos.4 to 6 under sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act for making an award as rule of the Court.
During the pendency of the application, Khadim Hussain, respondent No,3 moved an application for sending the thumb-impressions of Falak Sher and Imam Bakhsh, who are marginal witnesses of the arbitration agreement and the award to the Finger Print Expert for comparison and report as Imam Bakhsh while appearing as a witness of the petitioners had denied his thumb impressions on these two documents. This application was opposed by the petitioners. The Civil Judge, Bhakkar vide his order dated 3rd of March, 1990 accepted the application.
2. The petitioners challenged the above order in a revision petition which was hard by the Addl.
District Judge-II, Bhakkar who upheld the same vide his order dated 19th of December, 1990.
3. The petitioners have filed the instant writ petition to assail the orders of the Civil Judge as well as the Addl. District Judge.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The learned Civil Judge as well as the learned Addl. District Judge have in their orders given detailed reasons for accepting the application of respondent No,3 and sending the thumb-impressions of Falak Sher and Imam Bakhsh on the arbitration agreement and-A the award to the Finger Print Expert for comparison and report.
Learned counsel has not been able to assail the cogency of these reasons. The discretion exercised by the learned Courts below is neither arbitrary nor violate of any provision of law. I, therefore, do not find any valid ground to interfere with the discretion exercised by the learned Court below.
5. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed in limine.