' This R.SA. Arises out of a suit for recovery of an amount of Rs,10,457.01 filed by the respondent on 30-7-1962. The suit was decreed by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 22-4-1967. The appellant's appeal was dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sialkot vide his judgment and decree dated 26-5-1969.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the relevant record.
3. The two Courts below had perused the relevant record and recorded a finding of fact on issue No,1 to the effect that 3,49,425 bricks were supplied by the respondents to the appellant. This fact was proved by documents Ex.P1 to Ex.P.128 and the oral evidence of 44 witnesses. The concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Courts below on issue No,1 do not suffer from any misreading or A non-reading of the evidence or any other legal infirmity so as to justify interference under section 100 of the C.P.C. The learned counsel for the appellant has however, rightly pointed out that the Courts below have miscalculated the price of the bricks. Calculating at the rate of Rs,44.50 per thousand the total price of bricks comes to Rs,15,549.41. The appellant had paid a sum of Rs,7,767 through cheques. Another sum of Rs,200 was received in cash by Muhammad Shafi, one of the plaintiffs. Muhammad Shafi appeared as P.W.44 and admitted receipt of Rs,200 in cash. Thus the appellant was able to prove payment of Rs,7,967 and a sum of Rs,7,582.41 remained outstanding against them.
4. I, therefore, partly allow the appeal and reduce the decretal amount to Rs,7,582.41 leaving the parties to bear their own costs.