1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.---After hearing both the learned counsel we while condoning the delay in filing of this petition on the grounds stated in the application in that behalf, consider it proper to examine amongst others the following questions.
2. Civil Petition No.762 of 1979, leave wherein was granted on 22-3-1986, raises the same controversy between the parties as is involved in this petition. The only difference being that the said case related to title while the present one, as asserted by the learned counsel for the caveator, relates to possesstion of the same land. The question requiring examination would be in case the petitioners succeed in the said appeal will this success not react on the present case. In that context the merits of the present case would also need examination. Leave to appeal, accordingly, is granted.
3. Learned counsel states that the petitioners are almost destitutes. He has not charged any fee and that the expenses partly have also been incurred by him and further that security for costs was ordered in the above-referred case. Accordingly separate security need not be deposited in this case. Both matters shall be heard together.