RUSTAM S. SIDHWA, J.---Through the present petition Ali Aksar and others, petitioners basically seek clarification of the order of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, dated 27-2-.1989 passed in R.S.A. No.682 of 1968.
2. It appears that the parties having compromised the matter, the learned Single Judge recorded the same in his short judgment on 27-2-1989, also adding a clarification in the penultimate sentence for the purposes of being more explicit. It is now submitted that the said sentence has the effect of changing the very basis of the agreement between the parties and that the same should not have been recorded. It is not possible for this Court to review the judgment passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court, which was based on the agreement of the parties and which he recorded in their presence, with the necessary explanation to make the matter more explicit. 1f the petitioners have any grievance, they can move the learned Single Judge, for necessary clarification. There being no merit in this petition, the same is dismissed. However, nothing herein contained shah bar either party seeking clarification of the impugned judgment from the learned Judge who passed the impugned judgment.