1. NAIMUDDIN, J.--This is a miscellaneous appeal from the order of the Assistant Registrar of this Court, dated 5th November, 1989, whereby the Assistant Registrar, returned the application against the order passed on Civil Review Application No.80-R of 1988 stating as follows:-- "It is laid down in rule 9, Order XXVI of the Supreme Court Rules 1980, that after the final disposal of the first application for review no subsequent application shall lie to the Court and consequently shall not be entertained by the Registry. Therefore, this application is returned to the AOR." .
2. It is submitted that learned Assistant Registrar's order is based on wrong assumption of fact that a second review application was filed in the case. It is also submitted that the petitioner invoked the inherent power of this Court by the application on which the impugned order was passed. However, these submissions are not correct. The application was really in the nature of second review application as the prayer in the miscellaneous application was for re--examining the judgment of the Court, dated 4th September, 1989, which was passed by a Bench consisting of the Hon'ble then Chief Justice and six other Hon'ble Judges, whereby the Review Petition No.80-R of 1988, was allowed and the judgment, dated 30th October, 1988, was set aside and the appeal filed by the vendee in the Supreme Court (CA. 290/1988) was dismissed leaving intact the decision of the High Court. The order of the Assistant Registrar is correct and is in conformity with the Rules. We, therefore, dismiss this miscellaneous appeal. Even otherwise, we find no sufficient ground for exercising inherent power for reviewing the impugned order.