Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1990 SCMR 1090

TARIQ BUTT vs THE STATE

Citation1990 SCMR 1090
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Appeal 10 in Criminal Petition No, 5-R of 1990
Date1990-01-29
Judge(s)Nasim Hasan Shah, Saad Saood Jan
ResultBail allowed

ORDER

' SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.---The petitioner was arrested on 9-10-1988 when a car driven by him was found to be carrying a very large quantity of heroin. After completion of the investigation, a challan was submitted in the Court of Magistrate exercising enhanced powers under section 30, Criminal Procedure Code. Even though the trial has started, it is clear from the statement made at the Bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Deputy Attorney-General and the Public Prosecutor in charge of the case, that it is unlikely that it would conclude within a short period.

2. Before us the petitioner seeks bail on the ground that the trial has not yet concluded even though he has been in custody for more than one year. In support of this petition the provisions of third proviso to section 497, Criminal Procedure Code are being invoked. This proviso reads as follows:-- "Provided further that the Court shall, except where it is of opinion that the delay in the trial of the accused has been occasioned by an act or omission of the accused or any other person acting on his behalf, direct that such person shall be released on bail--

(a) who being accused of any offence not punishable with death has been detained for such offence for a continuous period exceeding one year and whose trial for such offence has not concluded; or person who, in the opinion of the Court, is a hardened, desperate or dangerous criminal."

3. There is no satisfactory explanation why the trial has not so far been concluded. Although it is said that some of the adjournments made by the trial Court were at the request of the co-accused of the petitioner, it is not however the case of the learned Deputy Attorney-General that any of these adjournments was sought by or occasioned by the conduct of the petitioner.

4. After hearing the learned Deputy Attorney-General and the learned counsel for the petitioner we see no reason why the benefit of the above-mentioned proviso be not extended to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we, convert this petition into appeal and direct that the petitioner be released on bail on his executing bail bond in the sum of rupees two lacs, with two sureties in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial Magistrate.

Cited by 3 cases

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch