1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sought by the plaintiff side; against the dismissal by the High Court, of their Regular Second Appeal. They have failed throughout.
2. The petitioners had challenged sale on the basis of their alleged reversionary rights. The High Court has held that in view of the enforcement of Muslim Personal Law Shariat Act (Amendment)
3. Ordinance, 1983 the petitioners cannot succeed.
4. ' The view taken by the High Court has support of recent judgment of this Court Abdul Ghafoor and others v. Muhammad Shafi and others PLD 1985 SC 407. Learned counsel remained unable to meet this position. Leave to appeal, therefore, is refused.