SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.---The respondents in these two petitions filed two separate civil suits for declarations that their pays had been fixed incorrectly; that they were entitled to refixation of their pays in the proper scales and arrears of salary. The suits were decreed by the Senior Civil Judge at Bahawalpur. The Provincial Government did not care to file appeals against the judgments and decrees of the trial Court. However, during the course of execution proceedings an objection was raised that the respondents were not entitled to the scales to which they had been held entitled under the decrees. The objection was rejected by the executing Court and the appeal of the Provincial Government before the Additional District Judge and revision before the High Court failed. It now seeks leave to appeal from this Court.
2. The contention which the learned Additional Advocate-General wishes to raise in support of these petitions relates to the propriety of the decrees passed in favour of the respondents. It is well-settled that an executing Court cannot go behind the decree. It is no longer disputed that the Civil Court had the jurisdiction to entertain the suits of the respondents. We would, therefore, dismiss these petitions. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.