Pakistan Case Law← Search
1990 SCMR 1708

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL vs DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, FOREST DIVISION, LAHORE

Citation1990 SCMR 1708
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Judge(s)Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry, Shafi-ur-Rehman
ResultAppeal dismissed

SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.--- Leave to appeal was granted under Article 212(3) of the Constitution to examine whether while setting aside the order of dismissal of the appellant the Service Tribunal could deny him the benefit of his salary etc. And direct the period to be treated as extraordinary leave.

2. The appellant was proceeded against departmentally and dismissed from service and also an order of recovering Rs,16,300 was passed against him. It was upheld in appeal but set aside by the Service Tribunal on an appeal which held as hereunder:- "In these circumstances I hold that the Enquiry Officer or the Departmental authorities have not been able to prove the allegations against the appellant beyond any reasonable doubt. In view of this analysis I hold that the appellant cannot be held responsible for the damage caused to the Forest produce and the charges levelled against him are not proved.

' In granting the relief, however, the Tribunal observed as hereunder:-- "In view of the detained analysis, the impugned orders are set aside and the appeal is accepted.

The appellant shall be reinstated into service but the period from the date of his dismissal to that of re-instatement shall be treated as extrordinary leave without pay. There will be no order as to costs."

3. Rana Abdur Rahim, Advocate, the learned counsel for the appellant contended that as the appellant's dismissal order and also the order directing recovery of the loss was set aside, the Tribunal could not have denied him the back benefits, because it was for no fault of his own the appellant remained away from duty.

4. As regards the powers of the Service Tribunal or authority, setting aside the dismissal order, the following provision exists in the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974:-- "16. Pay.-- A civil servant appointed to a post or grade shall be entitled, in accordance with the rules, to the pay sanctioned for such post or grade: ' Provided that, when the appointment is made on a current charge basis or by way of additional charge, his pay shall be fixed in the prescribed manner: ' Provided further that where a civil servant has been dismissed or removed from service or reduced in rank, he shall, in the event of the order of dismissal, removal from service or reduction in rank being set aside, be entitled to such arrears of pay as the authority setting aside the order may determine."

5. Apart from the power possessed by the Tribunal, we find that in adopting the test of proof beyond reasonable doubt in departmental enquiry and on that test setting aside the dismissal order of the appellant, the Tribunal had shown a leniency, not warranted by law. In that background it could, on the facts of the case, deny him the back benefits. It was within its discretion. There appears material on the record to sustain the exercise of discretion in that manner.

6. No ground is made out for our interference. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed wiht no order as to costs.

Cited by 3 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search