' SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.---The petitioner, a brother of the deceased Muhammad Ejaz, seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the Lahore High Court dated 19-10-1987, whereby the conviction of the petitioner under section 302, P.P.C. Was set aside and altered to one under section 304, Part I, P.P.C., and the sentence already undergone was considered sufficient to meet the ends of justice.
2. Ghulam Oadir, respondent No,1 was tried for having caused the murder of Muhammad Ejaz on 29th of March, 1985 in a street within the limits of Police Station 'Saddar, Attock' on the suspicion that he was maintaining illicit relations with his daughter Mst. Shakeela. The prosecution case was that it was an unprovoked murder, out in the street when Muhammad Riaz and Muhammad Ejaz were taking their bullocks to the fields. The defence version was somewhat different and it has been described at great length by the convict himself in his statement before the Court. In support his daughter Mst. Shakcela also appeared.
3. If the statement of the convict and that of his daughter is given any credence, it would be a case of extreme sustained provocation. The High Court has in the light of evidence on record accepted their version and we do not consider that in doing so the Court has violated any provision or any principle of law. Hence it will be a case of re-appraisal of evidence which is not undertaken.
4. Leave to appeal is, therefore, refused. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.