' SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--The petitioner was a Patwari in Tehsil Lodhran of Multan district. After a regular departmental inquiry he was dismissed from service. He preferred a departmental appeal which was dismissed by the Commissioner. He then filed an appeal before the Service Tribunal which also remained unsuccessful. He now seeks leave to appeal from this Court.
2. The main allegation against the petitioner was that he had made unauthorised interpolations in the Revenue Record. He admitted during the course of the inquiry that he had made certain changes in the record but explained that as the earlier entries were erroneous, he had merely corrected them. This explanation was not found satisfactory either by the departmental authorities or by the learned Tribunal.
3. The contention raised before us relates in substance to appreciation of evidence. No substantial question of law of public importance arises here for our consideration. The petition is dismissed.