' The petitioner through this application has prayed for extension of time fixed by this Court for the disposal of the guardian application.
2. The relevant facts are that the petitioner filed a Constitutional petition against the order of the learned Guardian Judge and the lower appellate Court. The same was allowed on a technical ground and learned Guardian Judge was directed to decide the guardian petition expeditiously and in any case before 30-61990. The petitioner has now applied for extension of its time.
3. The petition is utterly misconceived. The petitioner has no locus standi to seek extension. Still more than a month is at the disposal of the learned Guardian Judge to decide the petition and there seems to be no genuine difficulty in deciding the petition in accordance with the time limit fixed by this Court especially when he had been permitted to hold day-to-day proceedings.
4. In this view of the matter, the petition is dismissed. A copy to be sent to the learned Guardian Judge.