1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Leave to appeal having been granted to a tenant against the orders of eviction (affirmed by the High Court by dismissing the petitioner's writ petition) he through his counsel has presented a deed of compromise with a request for its acceptance.
2. ' The learned counsel for the respondent is present. The deed of compromise is accompanied by a special power of attorney and is signed by the parties as well as the counsel for both sides. It reads as follows:- "(1) That the parties to the titled appeal have compromised in the following terms:-
(i) That Muhammad Akram appellant has undertaken to vacate the shop in dispute upto 3rd of September, 1989, and the respondent No,2 has no objection to the grant of the abovesaid time for vacation of the shop by the appellant.
(ii) That respondent No,2 undertakes to occupy the shop and her son Masoom Akhtar Asghar shall start his business within the statutory period after getting vacant possession of the shop. In case of failure to do so possession of the shop shall be immediately handed over to the appellant as a tenant on the same terms and conditions on which he is holding the shop at present.
3. ' Respondent No,2 Appellant, ' Sd./ Sd./ ' (Irshad Begum) (Muhammad Akram)
4. ' Through Advocate s/o Fazal Muhammad Appellant.
5. ' Sd./ Sd./ ' Through Advocate Through: Advocate."
6. The compromise appears to be genuine. There is no impediment in accepting the same for disposal of this appeal. The appeal is allowed in terms of the compromise, There shall be no order as to costs.