Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1990 SCMR 1391

LIAQUAT ALI FANI and another vs THE STATE

Citation1990 SCMR 1391
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No,113 of-1989 and Jail Petition
Date1989-01-21
Judge(s)Nasim Hasan Shah, Abdul Shakurul Salam, Syed Usman Ali Shah
ResultLeave granted

ORDER

1. ' S. USMAN ALI SHAH, J.---Liaquat All Fani petitioner in petition No,113 of 1989 and Ghulam Mustafa petitioner in Jail Petition No,48-R of 1989 alongwith Mushtaq Hussain, Ghularn Hussain, Muhammad Akram, Irshad Hussain and Amjad Hussain Shah were tried by the Additional Sessions Judge Narowal under section 302/34, P.P.C. For the murder of Sain Muhammad on 4-1-1985 at 4 p.m. In the Rato Chak graveyard room. The learned trial Judge vide his judgment dated 16-10-1986 convicted the petitioners in both the petitions under section 302/34, P.P.C. And sentenced both of thcm to death with line of Rs,5,000 each or in default of payment of fine they should suffer further R.I. For one year. The fine on realization was ordered to be paid to the heirs of the deceased. The other, five accused were however, acquitted from the charge of murder. Appeal filed by both the petitioners before the High Court was dismissed and their death sentence was confirmed vide order dated 21- 2-1989. Hence both these petitions for leave to appeal.

2. ' We have heard K.M. Samdani, the learned counsel for petitioner in Criminal Petition No,113 and in the light of his arguments, gone through the judgments of the Courts below. We have observed that the well-established principle for appraisal of the evidence has not been observed by the learned High Court against the accused petitioners in both these petitions. In case of jail petition, the learned counsel appearing for Liaquat Ali Fani was requested to put in his appearance and argue the case of Ghulam Mustafa also, who acceded to the request and with his arguments he convinced us making, both the cases for further consideration of this Court. Leave to appeal is, therefore, granted in both these petitions.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch