The petitioner through this Constitutional petition has challenged the order dated 19-8-1989 by which he has been sent back to High School, Dandala District Bhakkar.
2. The relevant facts are that the petitioner was posted as P.E.T. at Dandala when he was transferred vide order dated 3-8-1989 to Middle School, Yousaf Shah. However, this order was cancelled through impugned order dated 19-8-1989, hence present petition.
3. The petition was admitted to regular hearing and notice was issued to the respondent, who has appeared and contested the petition.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Additional Advocate-General on behalf of the respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that there was no justification, whatsoever, legal or otherwise to cancel the transfer after the same had taken effect.
Moreso when the petitioner was transferred to a vacant post.
5. On the other hand learned AA-G. has argued that the petitioner moved an application for his transfer to Yousaf Shah. The same was recommended and ultimately orders of transfer issued on 3-8-1989. However, later on it transpired that the students, who were getting their training in the Pupils Teacher Unit at Dandala will be deprived of education whereas at Yousaf Shah there is no such unit, therefore, the respondent after considering the pros and cons of the matter and also explaining the situation to the M.N.A., who has recommended the case of the petitioner for transfer to Yousaf Shah, proceeded to cancel the order. [It is maintained that there was no motive in cancelling the order. The impugned order has been passed only in the interest of the students of Pupil Teacher Unit studying at High School, Dandala.
6. I have given my anxious considerations to the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties.
The impugned order is fully justified. The petitioner has failed to make out a case for interference in Constitutional jurisdiction. There is neither any violation of law nor rules. The respondent mentioned the name of the M.NA., who has recommended the case of the petitioner for transfer. It is not the case where the transfer has been cancelled at the behest of politition. The position is rather reverse here. In this view of the matter, there is no merit in this petition. The same is dismissed. However, there is no order as to costs.