1. ' S. USMAN ALI SHAH, J.---This petition for special leave to appeal is directed against the order of the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, dated 2-12-1986, whereby his civil revision against the concurrent findings of facts of the Courts below, was dismissed.
2. ' The petitioner/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction regarding the land in dispute which was originally owned by Muhammad Boota deceased. The petitioner claimed himself to be the owner in possession of the suit land and according to him he had acquired the rights of ownership under the law of prescription, and all the three mutations (detailed description of which is given in the plaint) of inheritance in favour of the respondents/defendants were illegal, void and liable to be rectified. The suit after contest by the defendants was dismissed by the learned Civil Judge, Liaquatpur vide his order dated 20-2-1986. The petitioner's appeal before the Additional District Judge-III, Rahimyar Khan failed on 26-10-1986, and his civil revision before the High Court was also dismissed in limine, vide impugned judgment.
3. 'After going through the findings of the Courts below in the light of the arguments raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, we find that the suit of the petitioner was dismissed on finding of facts. His appeal before the District Court was dismissed on merits. Both the concurrent findings of fact by the Courts were not interfered with by the High Court in its revisional jurisdiction. The learned High Court also held that "the suit had abated under the Punjab Ordinance XIII of 1983 and an appeal against the trial Court's decree of dismissal of petitioner's suit did not lie."
4. ' Learned counsel for the petitioner argued all those points which stand concluded by the concurrent findings of all the three Courts below. We consider that it is not a fit case in which leave to appeal is to be granted. It is, therefore, dismissed.