Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1990 SCMR 612

FAHEEMUDDINPetitioncr vs SABEEHA BEGUM and another

Citation1990 SCMR 612
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Petition No,288 of 1989
Date1989-11-28
Judge(s)Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, Nasim Hasan Shah, Saad Saood Jan
ResultLeave granted

ORDER

1. ' NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.---The petitioner, who was already a married person, entered into a second marriage but without obtaining the permission from the Arbitration Council of the Local Council concerned. Sometime later, the second wife filed a complaint before the Ilaqa Magistrate alleging that the petitioner had not only defrauded her, by not disclosing that he was an already married person, but had also committed an offence under section 6 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 by marrying again without the permission of the Arbitration Council.

2. ' The Ilaqa Magistrate finding prima facie that an offence under section 6 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961 had been committed by the accused ordered that he be summoned to stand trial.

3. The petitioner filed a petition under section 561-A, Cr.P.C. For quashment of the proceedings before the Ilaqa Magistrate but the said petition was dismissed in limine by a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court. Hence this petition for leave to appeal.

4. In support of this petition, it is inter alia contended that the second wife has no locus standi to file a complaint for the alleged offence by the husband of polygamy inasmuch as she is not an aggrieved person within the meaning of section 6 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance because the said provision is intended for the protection of the rights of the first wife rather than that of the subsequent wife.

5. ' The question arising is one of first impression and requires further consideration. .

6. ' Further proceedings before the trial Magistrate shall remain suspended meanwhile. But the appeal shall he made ready expeditiously and put up for hearing at a very early date.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch