' SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.---In the Annual Confidential Reports of the petitioner for parts of the years 1977, 1978, 1979 and 1982, adverse entries were recorded. These were communicated to him by a letter dated 22-5-1984. He filed a representation for the expunction of these entries. His representation was rejected. He then preferred an appeal before the Punjab Service Tribunal. This was dismissed on the ground of limitation. He seeks leave to appeal from this Court.
2. It is not disputed that the petitioner's appeal before the learned Tribunal was out of time by 58 days. When called upon to explain the delay by the learned Tribunal, he stated that he was mistaken about the period within which the appeal had to be filed. The learned Tribunal did not find this explanation to be satisfactory.
3. The question whether on facts a case for condonation of delay had been made out was one for the Tribunal to decide. Its decision in this regard does not give rise to any question of law. Leave is refused.