Pakistan Case Law← Search
1990 PLC 480

BASHER AHMAD and others vs CHAIRMAN, TOWN COMMITTEE and others

Citation1990 PLC 480
CourtLabour Appellate Tribunal
Case No.Appeals Nos. FD-630/86-Pb. and No,FD-631/86-Pb
Date1986-12-23
Judge(s)Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi
ResultAppeals accepted

The two appeals captioned above arise from the decisions dated 31-3-1986 recorded by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No,5, Faisalabad, whereby directing the reinstatement of the appellants in service, the respondent was allowed to charge-sheet the appellants and pass any order in accordance with law. Since the points involved in both the appeals are common, they are being disposed of together through this single judgment.

2. The appellants were water carriers. They were directed to work as sweeper. It is alleged that they refused to work as such and went on strike. Without issuing any charge-sheet and holding any inquiry, they, were removed from service. In the written statements stand was taken that the appellants were not removed from service and that they themselves remained off duty. However, PW-1 in cross-examination admitted that the services of the appellants were terminated and in their place other persons were employed. The learned lower Court missed to see that the period of thirty days within which the appellants could be charge sheeted had expired. Since the services of the appellants were terminated on the plea that they had refused to work and had gone on strike, it is apparent that the alleged absence had come to the knowledge of the employer before the appellants were verbally removed from service. The period of limitation, therefore, had long ago run out before the learned lower Court passed the impugned orders. Since the period for charge- sheeting the appellants has expired, the permission to give charge-sheets is not maintainable. In the absence of charge-sheets no inquiry can be held and no action can be taken. The learned lower Court in these circumstances erred in allowing the respondent to charge-sheet the appellants and to proceed against them according to law. So far as back benefits are concerned, the appellants did not assert in their statements that they from the date of removal from service remained jobless.

3. As a result, the appeals are accepted and maintaining the orders of reinstatement permission given by the learned lower Court for charge-sheeting the appellants is withdrawn and proceedings against them are set aside.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search