' SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.---The petitioners filed a suit for a declaration that they were owners of about 32 kanals of land situate in village Bakhianwala in Tehsil Daska of Sialkot District. They claimed that initially they were mortgagees in the said land but as the mortgage had not been redeemed for more than sixty years they had become the owners thereof. The trial Court dismissed the suit after holding that there was no evidence on the record to show that the land in dispute was the same which had been mortgaged with them. Its finding in this regard was confirmed by the Additional District Judge, Sialkot. Before the High Court, the learned counsel appearing on their behalf conceded that he could not establish that the land in dispute was the same as had been mortgaged with them. Accordingly, the High Court dismissed their revision petition. The petitioners seek leave to appeal from this Court.
2. As noticed earlier, the claim of the petitioners to the land in dispute is based on the assertion that it was first mortgaged with them and as the mortgage had not been redeemed within the specified period, they had become owners thereof. As the petitioners had not been able to establish that they were ever mortgagees in the land in dispute, the basis of their claim thereto disappeared. In view of this position, their suit was rightly dismissed. This petition is without any merit. Leave is refused. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.