Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1989 MLD 760

ZULFIQAR AHMAD vs THE STATE

Citation1989 MLD 760
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No. 412/B of 1989
Date1989-02-22
Judge(s)Rashid Aziz Khan
ResultBail allowed

ORDER

A case under section 307, P.P.C. Stands registered against the petitioner with Police Station Mozang, Lahore, vide F.I.R. Dated 29-9-1988. The case was got registered by Muhammad Ashraf with the allegation that on 29-9-1988, at about 5/6 p.m., the first informant Muhammad Ashraf alongwith his friend Muhammad Salim went to the petitioner from whom Muhammad Ashraf was to take back his money. When they reached Mozang Adda they met the petitioner. The first informant asked him why he had not paid the amount; whereupon the petitioner abused him and said that he will not return the amount. The first informant also abused him. The petitioner is alleged to have given slap to Muhammad Ashraf whereupon he picked up brick-bat and hit it on the head of the petitioner. The petitioner is alleged to hove taken out pistol from the Shalwar and fired which did not hit anybody. He tried to fire again but did not succeed. The commotion attracted many people, therefore, the petitioner ran away.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the case against the petitioner is false.

Submits that the first informant is not injured at all instead the petitioner had received two injuries on his head. The contentions have been opposed by learned counsel for the State.

2. I have heard learned counsel. The petitioner is alleged to have fired an ineffective shot, when he had been hit by the first informant-with a brick-bat. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner has some force that if the petitioner was standing so close to the first informant then he could never have missed the target had he fired. I feel it is a case of further inquiry which entitles A the petitioner to the concession of bail. Therefore, the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 with two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner/Duty Magistrate, Lahore.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch