ORDERKhalid Paul Khwaja, J.- On 1.5.1989 at Police Station Akbari Gate Lahore a case under section 16 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 was registered against Abdul Majced Rakib and Abid Hussain Manzar accused at the instance of Muhammad Sale complainant.
2. It was alleged that in October, 1988 the above mentioned two accused took Rs.20,000/- from the complainant and arranged a visa for him to work in Saudi Arabia. As the working conditions there were not satisfactory the complainant came back to Pakistan on 23.4.1989 and found that on 22.3.1989 the aforesaid two accused had abducted his wife Mst.Shahnaz along with his three minor children and his sister-in-law Mst.Musarrat Shafique PW. It also came to his knowledge that the two accused had taken away along with them the household effects of the complainant. Mst. Musarrat Shafique made good her escape after about 16/17 days and came back to Lahore and informed the petitioner that his wife and children were taken to Hyderabad by the said accused.
3. On the same day i.e. On 1.5.1989 the statement of Mst.Musarrat Shafique PW was recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. She disclosed that the above mentioned two accused had taken her, her sister Mst. Shahnaz and her minor children to Hyderabad by train where a Pathan, who subsequently was identified to be Syed SuItan Shah petitioner, received them at the Railway Station Hyderabad and took all of them to an hotel in a car. She further stated that the two accused and the petitioner used to keep watch on them but she, somehow, managed to escape.
4. On 16.5.1989 Syed SuItan Shah petitioner was arrested from Hyderabad after having been indentified by Mst. Musarrat Shafique PW. On the same day the Investigating Officer recorded the statement of Ghulam Hussain, Principal, Poly-Technical College, Hyderabad, wherein he stated that he had arranged a house on rent for Abid Hussain Manzar accused at the instance of the petitioner who had told him that the said accused was the husband of Mst. Shahnaz and the father of the three children. He further stated that the petitioner used to visit them daily in the said house. On the same day the statement of Muhammad Umar the brother of Mst. Shahnaz abductee was recorded.
He stated that on having come to know that his sister along with her children had been abducted, he along with his brothers went to Hyderabad and contacted Syed SuItan Shah petitioner who was providing protection to the said accused. The petitioner admitted before them that Mst.Shahnaz and her children were living with Abid Hussain Manzar accused but was hesitant to disclose their whereabouts.
5. The petitioner applied for his bail but his bail application was dismissd by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Lahore vide order dated 13.6.1989. He has now come to this court for his bail.
6. I have heard the parties counsd and have gone through the record.
7. The statement of Mst. Musarrat Shafique, Principal Ghulam Hussain and Muhammad Umar PWs show that the petitioner was actively in league with his co-accused Abdul Majeed Rakib and Abid Hussain Manzar. These statements sufficiently connect him with the offence charged against him.
Up till now neither Mst.Shahnaz nor her minor children have been recovered. The police has also not been able to aprrest Abid Hussain Manzar accused who is absconding. In these circumstances, I do not feel inclined to hold that this is a fit case for the grant of bail. The mere fact that the petitioner is lodged in the judicial lockup or the offence charged against him does not faill within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C does not make it a good case for his release on bail.
Consequently the bail application is dismissed.