1. AJMAL MIAN, J.--This Review Petition has been filed on the ground that the nomination paper of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that his name did not appear in Ward No. 3 TC Matiari, whereas in the judgment passed by this Court the ground taken is that the names of the Proposer and Seconder did not appear on the Electoral Roll of TC 3 Matiari as held by the Appellate Authority.
2. At the time when the above petition was filed no specific ground was taken by the petitioner that the Appellate Authority had no jurisdiction to add the ground of rejection of the nomination paper, nor this was urged before us when we decided the above petition. However, Mr. Rasool Bux Unar learned counsel for the petitioner now contends that the Appellate Authority was not competent to add a new ground of rejection. Reliance has been placed on the case of Mir Muhammad Hamza v.
3. Election Authority for Baluchistan reported in 1984 CLC 318. It will suffice to observe that since this point was not urged before us when we had decided the above petition, we are not inclined to review the order, particularly in view of the fact that the election has already taken place.
4. The Review petition is dismissed.