1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Some land owners have sought leave to appeal against the dismissal by the High Court of their Constitutional petition which had arisen out of a case regarding consolidation.
2. ' The learned counsel for the petitioners repeated the same argument which was advanced at the time of hearing before the High Court; and, an additional ground that the entitlement of the petitioners has been reduced and further that the area near their tube-well has also been reduced.
3. None of these points was urged before the High Court. In these circumstances, we do not consider it necessary to permit the learned counsel to raise these questions of fact now before us.
4. In regard to the question of choice of land urged before the High Court, the same also falls within the realm of the findings of fact and at best propriety or sense of judgment. The order impugned before the High Court thus cannot be held to be without lawful authority nor the order suffers from any legal or other infirmity.
5. ' This petition, accordingly is dismissed.