1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--These petitions by vendees in separate pre-emption cases have called in question the dismissal of their civil revisions/writ petitions. One ground common to all of them urged by the learned counsel relates to the payment of deficient court-fee. It now stands concluded by the judgment of this Court in Siddique Khan PLD 1984 SC 289 which goes against the petitioners. In one of these cases C.P.299/84 the learned counsel for the petitioner stated that at the time of filing of the petition, the intention was to take up another ground also, namely, one relating to improvements. He further stated that it stands concluded by findings of fact against the petitioner (in that A case), therefore, he would not be able to press the same at this stage.
2. ' Similarly in the other petition (C.P.485/84) the learned counsel wanted to raise the question that the suit land was not the subject-matter of pre-emption. On this point also the findings of fact are against the vendees/petitioners and no justification has been made out factual or otherwise to interfere with it.
3. ' In view of what has been stated above, all these petitions are dismissed.