' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--The petitioner (the ex-husband) challenged a Khula decree passed in favour of Respondent No,2 in Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, without success.
2. When it was pointed to the learned counsel that in addition to the grounds stated in the impugned judgment for dismissal of the Writ Petition, we have further noticed that the petitioner's past conduct including that of making filthy allegations 'against the respondent is such that it seems that the parties would not be able to keep the limits of Allah, the learned counsel frankly stated that he has no intention to challenge the final break between the parties through the Court.
But he is interested only in getting a verdict that a child born from the womb of the respondent is illegitimate. When pointed out that this amounted adding fuel to. Fire, the learned counsel contented that if the dissolution of marriage would have taken place under section 14 of the Qazf Ordinance, the petitioner might have achieved the intended results.
3. When invited to show that notwithstanding the provisions of Section 14, the proceedings before the Family Court were had or otherwise incompetent for any reason, the learned counsel failed to advance any convincing argument. In addition to this we feel that the petitioner moved the High Court with ulterior motive. His approach to this Court is also with soiled hands. We therefore, refuse leave to appeal and the petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
' Leave to .