Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1989 MLD 841

SARWAR And Another vs THE STATE

Citation1989 MLD 841
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No. 401/B of 1989
Date1989-03-06
Judge(s)Muhammad Rafique Tarar
ResultBail declined

ORDER

Sarwar and Mushtaq alias Kalu petitioners have moved this petition for bail in a case registered against them and others under sections 148, 307 and 324/149, P.P.C.

2. In the occurrence which took place on 29-7-1988 at 6 p.m. Ahmad A.I P.W. Suffered injuries at the hands of the petitioners and their co-accused. Sarwar petitioner was armed with a Khanjar, gun and razor while Mushtaq petitioner was armed with a Chhuri, gun and razor. The part attributed to the petitioners was that they gave one Chhuri blow each to Ahmad All hitting his chest and back, respectively, and thereafter shaved his moustaches and eye-brows with their razors when he was lying unconscious.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that according to the F.I.R. Mushtaq petitioner had given a Chhuri blow on the back of Ahmad A.I but no such injury finds mention in the medico-legal report. He further submits that in the same occurrence Muzaffar Hussain, cousin of the petitioners, suffered six injuries, out of which injury N0.3 was declared grievous and a case was registered against the complainant party, therefore, it is a case of counter-version. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioners are in jail for the last more than six months and the challan has not been submitted in Court so far.

The learned Additional Advocate-General on the other hand, submits that the cross-case has since been cancelled having been found false and no private complaint has been filed, therefore, there is no cross-version in the field. He further submits that injury No.1 on Ahmad A.I injured was a stab wound on the left side of back of chest which has been specifically attributed to Mushtaq petitioner. It is further submitted that the challan will be filed in Court within a week.

4. Having gone through the material available on the record, I find that the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners have no force. Injury No.1 on Ahmad A.I P.W. Was a stab wound on the left side of back of chest. This injury has been specifically attributed to Mushtaq petitioner. Injury No.2 was a stab wound on front of chest. This injury is attributed to Sarwar petitioner. Both these injuries were on the vital part of the body and were declared grievous.

Ahmad A.I injured had as many as ten injuries, out of which nine were by sharp--edged weapon. It is a case of merciless beating. Admittedly the cross-case has been cancelled and no complaint has been filed against the complainant party. The material collected by the investigating agency prima facie links the petitioners with the commission of offence with which they have been charged on the circumstances, I am not inclined to admit the petitioners to bail at this stage. The petition is dismissed.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch