' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sought by a plaintiff in a suit for declaration on the question; whether he was entitled to retain a small part of the plot of land sold to the respondent side. The sale was no doubt of 5 Kanals of area, but, the measurement of the site and boundaries of the plot were also specified in the sale-deed.
2. The petitioner's claim that in case a marla is equal to 260 square feet, he would be able to retain some area over and above 5 Kanals so counted. The respondents' case is that the marla is equal to 272 square feet in the concerned locality. Moreover, according to measurements and boundaries also, the respondents' case would get supported. The petitioner's suit was decreed; but, the respondents' appeal was allowed, while petitioner's Civil Revision was dismissed by the High Court.
3. After questioning the learned counsel, we are satisfied that if the entire deed is read together, the petitioner had sold the entire plot. There was no scope for him now to retain any part thereof on the basis of one calculation ignoring the other. To be fair to the respondents side, the learned counsel himself referred to A.R. Khan v. P.N. Boga through Legal Heir, PLD 1987 SC 107; which, he frankly stated would support the respondents' case.
' Accordingly, leave to appeal is refused. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.